Affiliate? Post Your Tickets at www.eticketslist.com
Click to Buy or Sell Sports and Concert and Theater Tickets
Run the business of a sports league, play the XFL Simworld.
2005 Oakland Super Bowl: Who's For It?
Few officials at news conference boosting bid
(10-26) 04:00 PDT OAKLAND --
Oakland unveiled its bid to bring a Super Bowl to Network Associates
Coliseum in 2005 at a City Hall news conference yesterday that was
notable for the Bay Area politicians who did not attend.
There was no Oakland Mayor Jerry Brown. No San Francisco Mayor
Willie Brown. No representative from either the Oakland Raiders or
the San Francisco 49ers. A Raiders official said the team wasn't
The sum total of elected officials who showed up at the news
conference to root for the home town: Alameda County Supervisor Gail
Steele, City Councilman Dick Spees and a representative for Rep.
Barbara Lee, D-Oakland.
It's pretty clear why the Raiders didn't show up, even though they
are expected to back the bid, mainly because it would be very weird
to cast a vote against your own city.
But the multimillion-dollar legal dispute between the Raiders and
the Coliseum authority, a city-county agency that operates the
stadium, is an open wound that has not healed.
When league owners meet Wednesday to decide where the big game
should be played, Raiders owner Al Davis is expected to back the home
team -- but it appears that's as far as the Raiders are willing to go
-- publicly at least.
Behind the scenes, some Raiders officials have lobbied on the
city's behalf but can't publicly endorse the deal because of the
3-year-old legal dispute.
That issue plus the vanity of San Francisco's Mayor Brown, who
fears that a successful Oakland bid could damage future bids from his
town, has made the Super Bowl bid a tough sell to East Bay
politicians and others.
San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown has said he supports the idea but
cannot commit city resources to the bid.
Neither will Oakland. local politicians have been reluctant to
commit time or financial resources because of the disastrous 1995
deal that brought the Raiders back to town.
When personal seat licenses did not sell as well as expected after
the team's return to the East Bay five years ago, local taxpayers
were saddled with millions of dollars in debt for the construction of
a monolithic seating addition that's come to be known as Mount Davis.
``There are people in government who don't understand the nature
of sports sponsorship,'' said Zenophon Abraham, the architect of the
city's Super Bowl pitch as president of the nonprofit Oakland-Alameda
County Sports Commission.
``They don't know what it means to sell, sell, sell.''
Abraham's proposal relies primarily on corporate sponsorship that
kicks in only when, and if, a bid is secured.
Unfortunately, local politicians who negotiated the Raiders'
return are very sensitive to public criticisms that they spend,
spend, spend, even if scoring the game would bring millions of
dollars in tourist revenue to the city.
In spite of the lack of a united political front, an 11th-hour
meeting between city officials may have persuaded Oakland's Mayor
Brown to attend next week's presentation before league owners in
It wouldn't be a bad idea for Jerry Brown to take the handoff and
run with it. He's the city's most visible resident, and his presence
would send the right kind of signal to NFL owners.
This would be a turnabout for Brown, who refused, even mocked, a
delegation of local politicians who attended a meeting of Major
League Baseball owners in Cooperstown last fall to push for league
approval of an ill-fated deal to sell the Oakland A's to a local
group led by former A's executive Andy Dolich.
Steele will offer up a resolution at today's meeting of the
Coliseum authority to support the bid, but it is expected to be met
with tough opposition by her colleague, Supervisor Mary King. King
could be joined by Oakland Councilman Ignacio De La Fuente, who has
bumped heads with Al Davis over the lawsuit.
``I have no approval from the council to take a a position to
support this proposal,'' De La Fuente said. ``I don't think it's a
feasible option, and I can't support any resolution that would make
us (financially) responsible.''
Oakland is one of three finalists for the 2005 bowl bid, competing
against two Florida cities: Jacksonville, a league newcomer, and
Miami, which has hosted more Super Bowl games than any other city.
Jacksonville's City Council has passed resolutions pledging
financial support for the event, and Miami boasts 11 five-star hotels
The Bay Area is a preferable destination to either of those
cities, but the legal dispute and lack of political will to make it
happen will surely be considered by league owners when the vote is
Bruce Allen, a senior assistant in the Raiders organization,
suggested that the ongoing battle may prompt more questions from
owners than the city's Super Bowl bid.
``I think the league and many of the owners are looking forward to
asking many questions to the East Bay political leaders, because they
want to know what happened to our deal,'' Allen said.
If that happens, the city should just go ahead and punt.
Chip Johnson's column appears in The Chronicle on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. He can be reached at (510) 433-5984, by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org, or by writing The Chronicle at 483 Ninth St., Suite 100, Oakland, CA 94607.
Visit the SBS home page at http://www.sbs-world.com to learn about SBS.